92 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
92 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: idea-evaluator
|
|
description: Evaluate startup ideas, product concepts, MVPs, and business ideas with staged multi-agent debate, market reasoning, competitive analysis, and a final score and verdict. Use when asked whether an idea is worth pursuing, whether there is a real market, what the strongest reasons for and against are, or whether to plan an MVP.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Idea Evaluator
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
Use this skill to judge whether a user idea is worth building.
|
|
|
|
Treat the task like a structured decision engine:
|
|
|
|
- gather opposing viewpoints,
|
|
- pressure-test the idea,
|
|
- assess market potential,
|
|
- and give a clear recommendation.
|
|
|
|
## Operating Model
|
|
|
|
Run the evaluation in 3 stages.
|
|
|
|
Before moving to the next stage, wait until every agent in the current stage has finished its research and returned its output.
|
|
|
|
### Stage 1: Broad Scan
|
|
|
|
Launch 5 subagents.
|
|
|
|
Assign them distinct roles:
|
|
|
|
- 2 against the idea
|
|
- 2 for the idea
|
|
- 1 neutral agent that gives 1 strong pro and 1 strong con
|
|
|
|
Make the roles meaningfully different. Do not let them collapse into the same answer.
|
|
|
|
Each subagent should focus on:
|
|
|
|
- market need
|
|
- customer pain
|
|
- competition
|
|
- timing
|
|
- feasibility
|
|
- evidence where available
|
|
|
|
### Stage 2: Deep Debate
|
|
|
|
Launch 2 additional subagents.
|
|
|
|
Assign them these roles:
|
|
|
|
- 1 fully pro
|
|
- 1 fully against
|
|
|
|
Ask each one to make the strongest possible case for its side.
|
|
|
|
They should sharpen the debate, not repeat Stage 1.
|
|
|
|
### Stage 3: Final Judgment
|
|
|
|
Read all subagent output and make the final call.
|
|
|
|
Your final response must:
|
|
|
|
- give the idea a score from 1 to 10,
|
|
- summarize the strongest positive arguments,
|
|
- summarize the strongest negative arguments,
|
|
- state a clear verdict,
|
|
- and ask whether the user wants to plan an MVP next.
|
|
|
|
## Decision Standards
|
|
|
|
Use evidence and market logic over vague enthusiasm.
|
|
|
|
If the market looks weak, crowded, or unproven, say so plainly.
|
|
|
|
If the idea looks strong, explain why it survives criticism.
|
|
|
|
Avoid false certainty.
|
|
|
|
## Final Output Format
|
|
|
|
Keep the response concise and decision-oriented.
|
|
|
|
Include:
|
|
|
|
- score out of 10
|
|
- short verdict
|
|
- positives
|
|
- negatives
|
|
- MVP question
|