feat. append structured details to markdown comment in format_result_comment

tests/test_review_format.py

@@ -3,19 +3,33 @@ from __future__ import annotations
 from gitea_codex_bot.services.review_format import format_result_comment
 
 
-def test_format_result_comment_uses_markdown_comment_verbatim_with_marker() -> None:
+def test_format_result_comment_appends_structured_details_to_markdown_comment() -> None:
     body = format_result_comment(
         "abc1234",
         {
-            "verdict": "correct",
+            "verdict": "has_issues",
             "confidence": 0.9,
-            "summary": "ignored when markdown_comment exists",
-            "findings": [],
-            "markdown_comment": "## Codex Review\n\nAll good.\n\nNo issues found.",
+            "summary": "2 issues detected.",
+            "findings": [
+                {
+                    "severity": "high",
+                    "file": "src/app.py",
+                    "line_start": 20,
+                    "line_end": 22,
+                    "title": "Unsafe command execution",
+                    "body": "User input is passed directly into shell=True.",
+                    "suggestion": "Use a fixed argument list and avoid shell=True.",
+                }
+            ],
+            "markdown_comment": "## Codex Review\n\nShort agent message only.",
         },
     )
     assert body.startswith("<!-- codex-review:head_sha=abc1234 -->\n## Codex Review")
-    assert "All good.\n\nNo issues found." in body
+    assert "Short agent message only." in body
+    assert "### Structured Findings" in body
+    assert "2 issues detected." in body
+    assert "`src/app.py:20-22` (high)" in body
+    assert "Unsafe command execution" in body
 
 
 def test_format_result_comment_replaces_existing_marker() -> None: